A belated May the Fourth be with you! Speaking of reliable systems, for all its appearances the Millennium Falcon was pretty reliable. Known as a piece of junk, it was surprisingly reliable and fit Hans' needs. Hans and Lando didn't follow any management of change processes for all the modifications they made, but it had some impressive performance: making the Kessel Run in less than 12 parsecs...

Now look at the death star. A beautiful sphere, but it wasn't a moon. It was a model of Imperial design, but one shot in an exhaust port: Catastrophic failure. Watch out for those low likelihood, high consequence events.

Just goes to show that appearances don't mean everything in asset performance, and design for reliability will keep those scruffy nerf-herders off your back. 😉 #HanShotFirst #MayTheFourth #AssetManagement

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Breaking Bricks: Hello!

Image
Hello and welcome to the Breaking Bricks blog! This is my first blog and I am excited to share some ideas and thoughts based on my own life experiences: Life as a father of three with my wonderful wife My past times: Curling, Lego, Star Wars, everything in between... My career as an engineer in the maintenance and reliability worlds My faith and how it continues to shape my life How to juggle family, work, faith and everything else - including how to mess it up! Most importantly, I'm hoping to share how breaking bricks and royally messing up can only make you a better person! The goal (for now) is to write something at least once per month, but we'll see how it goes. I am sure not everything I write will resound with everyone, and that's the exciting part.
Read more

Change in Maintenance = Change Management

Image
Here's a stat that surprised me until I saw it: What if half your PM program isn't delivering the reliability you expect? It may even be making things worse. It's a tough pill to swallow, but often the culprit isn't the quality of the work or even the skill of your team. It's change management. If you're running a PM program and leveraging PdM/CBM data do any of these sound like your reality? 'It saves time to just copy-paste that PM to similar assets, even if their operating context isn't quite the same.' 'Our PM tasks? They don't need to be overly detailed. We've always done it this way, and the team knows what " check " really means.' 'Our condition monitoring flags a fault, and we interpret that as: "Great, now we know we can push this asset closer to failure before intervening."' 'After a failure, we identified the mode and created a new PM. Layering this with our existing CBM will surely prevent...
Read more

How Lego Teaches Us About Implementing Shiny, New Things

Image
Joining Lego and Star Wars is a beautiful match – both timeless and innovative, much like the drive for innovation in our organizations. Implementing that new technology or process can feel like opening that R2-D2 Lego set : pure excitement and anticipation! But successful builds start with why. Are we solving a problem? Are we just trying to get the coolest tech? And before we crack open the Lego set, hold on! Even Lego has some illegal building techniques . Lego enthusiasts know that incorrect practices can cause stress or damage, instability in connections, or violate the design intent. Does this sound familiar to you? Just like when I'm tempted to stick a plate between Lego studs, grab that scaffold pole to tighten a valve, or use the fancy AI model when Excel is more effective, often we try to take shortcuts leading to stress on our assets, processes, or people, leading to more waste and unfortunate and preventable incidents. How do you best channel the initial excitement of ...
Read more